brooklinefuture.org

Where Growth Came From

Cumulative FY2017–FY2024 change, current parcel boundaries
← current land value ← value/tax by year FY2009-26, tax-based →
Loading…
New construction (ever added a unit / new or reclassified commercial parcel, FY18–24)
Likely renovated (structural signal, a flagged large swing, or cumulative growth well above the town's typical no-change rate)
Everything else — height/color = $ growth per sqft of land, FY17→24
How "likely renovated" is determined: most of these are the identified_renovation / unclassified_large parcels from the classifier, plus a newer check — parcels whose total FY17→24 growth exceeds the town's own empirical no-structural- change baseline (47.6% compounded, not the commonly-assumed Prop 2.5 2.5%/year figure, which caps the tax levy, not assessed values) by more than 30 points. That second check is a bottom-up estimate, not a certainty — it catches gradual value-adding activity the per-year structural rules miss, but "grew faster than typical" isn't proof of renovation on its own. See METHODOLOGY.md ยง6 for full detail and known limits.